Ideosphere Forum
From owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com Sun Feb 23 21:39:49 2020
Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 01O2dnxd007106
	for <fx-propose-outgoing@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:39:49 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id 01O2dnh5007105
	for fx-propose-outgoing; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:39:49 -0500
Received: from mail-yb1-f176.google.com (mail-yb1-f176.google.com [209.85.219.176])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 01O2dmuU007101
	for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 21:39:48 -0500
Received: by mail-yb1-f176.google.com with SMTP id b196so3558306yba.4
        for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:39:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=1PLKH6tgmD7kL+9OictvHadfNdbO1W8wZ8VKFYYe5Rc=;
        b=uS53sBImnkd9HiwEm5PztyNCn8qSsb2/GT30BcRYJZ1zQ9WSYGQ6EfM4NykeEEchwy
         AYv7AWJERpxBqLGor8e0N/WC5xWDODlbWnIvBnM4eM+85Y6Vb0XTPbUxEFCZ0vs/661X
         lbOQULKIZlJ5XZWu32mWI2rNoI/vsMVd4kClLDV3fMt/vzHv8hrSSS7u/WncZTWxZwW4
         ieU4V0EkZv0k1zK+9gaM5hVjhLOeo+K5sInFTA4mFgtNw0K9BTEVOU+FY2SLpLevwWAa
         Hc6rCry3dyanydGa7LOAIOt2I2b6HFA3+O2UCos34Ci7/FNfPYEvy5VSdNesRHlTAMfH
         7DrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=1PLKH6tgmD7kL+9OictvHadfNdbO1W8wZ8VKFYYe5Rc=;
        b=q2LJ29oWt7WBiDuYMkCT7a9W1EnHHb4VpE5vF1TPc9paBAX58KAQ9b2/ap6DbwUEeh
         MLDaI0DpOmLCoYuhVWVnX0WJLTf2ZTkGfK9YXyz4iYXK7eHvgQEu7vO7ITzIoDKJifRO
         uir+FJ04Eevzj2nw9Yy90g6hsvnr9dSTTV5cNxaNq//Zde5ntqeSFuHzAZXrW1B5AOyB
         yBIljPrqR7k0HHsXgAgtkde4sgAXymMCMJGlwstIzCdMbm+0ZqkQdjeFrZ0g4Q01BgeX
         IcaYQF7NtUwj5k1eytEJSup4YS70yask+mQQmVKNCCs+qasBT59kBi0TFP8+Qd+rUyu4
         g7HQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXb5Tjm/0n6EmHAzfwfO/zXXHVd+LjCB/koNdMerggiYmKYTSIF
	q7vSa1/dS+hVB58zwviNQ8dBrR+unkEZN3vML/Bpxg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxOwi0La0qt5uuxDyRD4eKc7T2KEdIXxI7bX2lEh2NqCy6j32QW2/0ZENnKWKgL5EWyymSVUgm0uEFAEXwJaqc=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:d7c9:: with SMTP id o192mr43255320ybg.384.1582511987756;
 Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:39:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <202002210030.01L0UcuK006718@ideosphere.com> <391847523.2746677.1582292496751@mail2.virginmedia.com>
 <CAAra84RP0boH=ge-xTLnZrOdpfCWjJc_1H2=43ie+yOXp=xL6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <1688006519.2756621.1582311887591@mail2.virginmedia.com> <CAAra84TRR5srNttTyMwJ+V6z93T0vfNbko8DP1rBq0NtQG_f2g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+EdDHhgm+x9otEfBXsFXQmzjTcUtJmZgbvR5hLkMBn56BTaUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1231706490.2759601.1582327976220@mail2.virginmedia.com> <8D6F2CF0-A0CE-4AB1-A55F-61B15FD359C6@kreme.com>
 <CAAra84QosEjEiUgRgEEthpM54cSCfc5S5-2_8L6i_6M3D7FHNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAra84QosEjEiUgRgEEthpM54cSCfc5S5-2_8L6i_6M3D7FHNg@mail.gmail.com>
From: scryer@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 18:39:22 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+EdDHi5-iTv3q-7Ky0GtYgfW2pbmhuwfnmH9Rg=1Zq1YpRaig@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fx-propose: Revision of Proposal: 'R2020'
To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e21428059f49484c"
Sender: owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com

 
 I agree. Winning the election (i.e. making it through the Constitutional
hoops) is an interesting enough proposition. The other aspects could be
handled by a COUP20-style claim with its own set of rules.

On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 6:26 PM Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 11:54 PM @lbutlr <kremels@kreme.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> What ifs there is no tie, but the instruments of government refuse to
>> acknowledge the vote? What if he lose the EC and is still awaited the
>> Office? What if Trump simply refuses to leave office and has the backing of
>> all the people he’s appointed who have pledged loyalty to him and not the
>> US?
>>
>
> The original claim was "Trump wins the presidential election in 2020."
> This seems to me to be the intent of the claim -- the winning of the
> election, not all the possible, impossible, and imaginary scenarios that
> may take place later.
>
> I personally think that the whole discussion of who is or isn't legally
> president on a certain day in 2021 is beside the point IF the original
> intent of the claim was about the election itself -- i.e. the will of the
> American people etc etc -- and not about legal shenanigans. And the way you
> measure who has won a presidential election is by the Electoral College
> counts presented to Congress. (And if you're worried that there's a chance
> the results may be delayed, then push the deadline way back, because saying
> that a candidate hasn't won because the results aren't in sounds strange to
> me.)
>
> If, however, the claim proposer is more interested in who is in office on
> Feb 1st, regardless of the election, then we should remove the election
> aspect entirely, and determine some other way that we will decide what
> counts as being the "President of the USA."
>
> I think tying the two parts together is what's generating all the
> discussion.
>
> Sam
>


-- 
          Jim Gillogly

Back to regular message display

All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL