> >Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1996 10:28:39 -0700 (PDT)
> >From: Vinay Kumar <vinayk@nautilus.CS.Berkeley.EDU>
> >On Tue, 15 Oct 1996, Ken Kittlitz wrote:
> >> long:
> >> There will be a proof showing the nonexistence of odd perfect numbers
> >> or a proof showing the existence of an odd perfect numbers
> >Nitpicking, but that should be "an odd perfect number"
> Bleah; that's what happens when you change wording midstream. Either "an
> odd perfect number" or "odd perfect numbers"; plural probably makes more
I disagree. What if someone finds ONE odd perfect number but can't prove
that there are more of them?
"Oh, well, what the hell." - Yossarian