Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'POIL30'

Author: chrisran.bma e-mail
Conversation: fx-propose: Proposal: 'POIL30' ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-propose ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: Sam Fentress's post
Date: Fri Aug 24, 2018 04:43 pm
Sam Fentress
chrisran.bma e-mailchrisran.bma e-mail




After pressing send, I am thinking 2 year waiting period is not long enough: Suppose event starting Nov 2024 continues to significantly affect oil production though April 2026. That is only an 18 month period but 2024 2025 and 2026 might need to be allowed to be below 95% without the claim being judged.

OTOH if it started early in a year and lasted less than 18 months then judge may well find it appropriate to shorten the 3 calendar year period to 2 or even 1 year.

With different possibilities for the way an event tails off in its effects, I am feeling a need to leave it subjectively shrinkable as suggested rather than non subjective period.

Regards

Chris

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL