Ideosphere Forum

fx-discuss: Text of my Thursday, 10:29 AM e-mail to fx-propose@ideosphere.com

Author: Richard Woods
Conversation: fx-propose: Text of my Thursday, 10:29 AM e-mail to fx-propose@ideosphere.com ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-discuss ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To:
Date: Mon Feb 20, 2017 04:58 am
Richard Woods
Richard Woods




On last Thursday at 10:29 AM I e-mailed the following to fx-propose@ideosphere.com, but I have not yet seen it appear in my in-box.

I don't see anything wrong with the To: field. Am I missing some flaw?

So, why has it not yet been fed back to my in-box from fx-propose@ideosphere.com?

And why has my agreement to judge TrumpX not been accepted?

Richard Woods
(1682)

- - begin quoted text - -
Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TrumpX'
Thursday, February 16, 2017 10:29 AM
Mark as Unread

From:
"Richard Woods" <ribwoods@yahoo.com>
To:
fx-propose@ideosphere.com

Full Headers Printable View
Thank you for removing some unnecessary wording from the claim.

Yes, I'm still interested in judging the (renamed) TrumpX claim. (I apologize for not getting back sooner.)

May we have a grammar correction to the claim wording of "... will either be impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office, before January 20, 2021"?

Either move "either" to precede the first "will", or delete the second "will", so that the result is

either "... either will be impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office, before January 20, 2021"

or "... will either be impeached by the House of Representatives or resign from office, before January 20, 2021."

I prefer the first alternative.

:-)

Richard Woods (1682)

--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 2/15/17, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote:

Subject: Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Date: Wednesday, February 15, 2017, 9:55 AM

Clearly
things are heating up on this front, and we still have no
claim to trade...
Does
anyone volunteer to be a judge on this?
In case it got lost in the ticker
name change, the claim can be found at http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX
On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at
8:15 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
wrote:
Thank
you.
Richard
Woods, I think this meets many of your concerns from
earlier. Are you still interested in judging?
Sam
On Jan 28, 2017 2:27 PM,
"Ken Kittlitz" <kittlitz@gmail.com>
wrote:
OK, it should be
done now. Let me know if anything appears amiss.

-Ken
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at
4:24 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
wrote:
Since no one has made a
comment on that one way or another then yes,
thanks.
On Jan 27, 2017 5:24 PM,
"Ken Kittlitz" <kittlitz@gmail.com>
wrote:
I can probably change it in the DB. You'd
like the symbol to be 'TrumpX'?
-Ken
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at
6:34 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
wrote:
Also, how do I change the ticker symbol? Do I have
to delete it and make a new claim?
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at
9:50 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
wrote:
Sorry, I dropped the ball on this.
How about we keep the Resign option,
but forget about trying to judge any reasoning behind it. So
far, the only president who has resigned was about to be
impeached anyway.
How
about:
TrumpX
Donald Trump, 45th President of
the United States, will either be impeached by the House of
Representatives or will resign from office,
before January
20, 2021.
The
claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on
the adoption
of a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment;
conviction by the Senate is not material to the claim. The
claim may also be judged early on death, but should not be
judged early if Trump vacates office for any other reason,
in case he is reinstated before the judgement
date.
Thoughts? Richard, would you still
be willing to judge?
Sam
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at
5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <scryer@gmail.com>
wrote:
I'm still fine with the
TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to propose others or
offer proposed improvements to this one.
On Sat,
Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>
wrote:




I seem to have killed this conversation.Not
sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes
coupons could be an actionable libel ? "Perhaps
we should instead consider two claim:Trump wins
second term andTrump is not president for at least 30
consecutive days of what would be expected to be his first
term.RegardsChris


--

Jim Gillogly

- - end quoted text - -



Previous Next

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL