Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-discuss: TWAC

Author: The Silent Observer
Conversation: Proposal: 'TWAC' ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-discuss ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: Carlos Munoz's post
Date: Fri Aug 23, 1996 01:21 pm
Carlos Munoz
The Silent Observer

Carlos Munoz wrote:
> Well, there's strong evidence the TWA crash was caused by an explosive.
> The only thing left to find out is if it was a bomb or a missile, officials
> are undecided as to which it is. Structure shock analysis will determine
> which one it was, unless they find more evidence that helps them out. It
> won't be long now.
> Once again, how I will judge:
> bomb => TWAC = true
> missile or
> other => TWAC = false
> - Carlos Munoz, UID 1

I might just point out that yesterday's papers carried a wire story
indicating the explosion investigation is now considering a fuel
explosion from a tank leak -- they said the sound recorded on the cockpit
voice recorder was incosistent with the one over Lockerbie, less of
the sharp shock of high explosives and more of the soft character one
might expect from fuel igniting in a closed space -- like the forward
cargo hold, just ahead of the main internal tank and just inboard of the
wing tanks.

I've already got my NOs...

| It's easier to create chaos than order -- 2nd law of thermodynamics |
| |
| TableTop Publications |
| All opinions expressed are my own, and should in no way be mistaken |
| for those of anyone but a rabid libertarian. |


All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL