Ideosphere Forum
From owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com Thu Feb 23 20:25:23 2017
Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1O1PNEX022460
	for <fx-propose-outgoing@ideosphere.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:25:23 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id v1O1PNVb022459
	for fx-propose-outgoing; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:25:23 -0500
Received: from mail1.bemta12.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta12.messagelabs.com [216.82.251.8])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1O1PMir022456
	for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 20:25:22 -0500
Received: from [216.82.249.35] by server-8.bemta-12.messagelabs.com id 63/E4-31537-18B8FA85; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 01:25:21 +0000
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprAIsWRWlGSWpSXmKPExsVyWmfVEt3G7vU
  RBm1HRSz2d99gdmD0OL7vHVsAYxRrZl5SfkUCa0b7hFfMBeuLK77/02tgPJ3UxcjBwSkQKLF2
  O5DJxSEksJpN4n7HBtYuRk4OEQFZiS3X14DZvAKCEidnPmEBsYUFtCWOTLwNFpcQ8JBY3D4by
  jaS+P62nQ3EZhNQk9i0aSsLRG+CxPaGHrAaFgFViVkNz9gg6uczSsxtcAexmQUCJD7eX8Q8gZ
  FnFpJ1s5CkIGwdiROrjkHZ2hKLrvxkX8DIsopRozi1qCy1SNfQUi+pKDM9oyQ3MTNH19DQSC8
  3tbg4MT01JzGpWC85P3cTIzCk6hkYGHcwTmn0OsQoycGkJMob4ro+QogvKT+lMiOxOCO+qDQn
  tfgQowwHh5IEb2w5UE6wKDU9tSItMwcY3DBpCQ4eJRHeR2VAad7igsTc4sx0iNQpRkUpcV5lk
  D4BkERGaR5cGyyiLjHKSgnzMjIwMAjxFKQW5WaWoMq/YhTnYFQS5lUCmcKTmVcCN/0V0GImoM
  WWzmtBFpckIqSkGhhXrLD6N3WekILfFccL3lM37rfuub9h4pz+/QvPacY/bjmiVp5repWLd6e
  +wrbvzocEQw6u4F3QyZku773shqzSzJotDud97sl4SJ/8P1cqLelL/ZV9m+eujtGd/nj5CstE
  kZXnl6XtnZ7heepWeLT9cXbp6ku90TuV9LRnNYe895fIMV6brtynxFKckWioxVxUnAgAWnrjJ
  6MCAAA=
X-Env-Sender: MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-138.messagelabs.com!1487899520!72233496!1
X-Originating-IP: [203.44.170.164]
X-StarScan-Received: 
X-StarScan-Version: 9.2.3; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 2178 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2017 01:25:20 -0000
Received: from 203-44-170-164.tpips.telstra.com (HELO Domino03.airport.local) (203.44.170.164)
  by server-15.tower-138.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2017 01:25:20 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CACJR2qFNwCM9gYsYWyUpzv-eOnPCkyv9z013A=-ZAxfnwJywyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201701121852.v0CIq92S002947@ideosphere.com> <722B4A4D-14AA-4B7F-895A-214ADFC2BFCE@postmodern.com> <6389620b-4867-bbe1-c1e9-d40be237db51@pobox.com> <CAAra84R7SCvrHo4aTo89UZK5pA9Z4QvYKbZSbo+Fh9EOsE6+oA@mail.gmail.com> <1009793118.1088178.1484322439398.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe17.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <b59239a6-acf9-be47-f692-acad4a7c758b@pobox.com> <1817388409.1097547.1484339345031.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe17.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <1703629019.1351450.1485012664436.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe15.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net> <CA+EdDHiu+8mPAZTsb_6O59cSyZ6LZn7H=diGvEEg2uD=wp1d7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAAra84T1L+KgMqEVHN0Ud-9oiiPENSMB1ab5D1txaU_8pOppQg@mail.gmail.com> <OF16B738F7.3E6331DD-ON4A2580C9.0000B7FB-4A2580C9.0001B2A4
 <CACJR2qFNwCM9gYsYWyUpzv-eOnPCkyv9z013A=-ZAxfnwJywyw@mail.gmail.com>
To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
X-KeepSent: B92F69C0:1EF0F32A-4A2580D1:0007809C;
 type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: IBM Notes Release 9.0.1 October 14, 2013
From: MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au
Message-ID: <OFB92F69C0.1EF0F32A-ON4A2580D1.0007809C-4A2580D1.0007CFF6@blackandwhitecabs.com.au>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:25:19 +1000
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Domino03/BAW/AU(Release 9.0.1FP1|April  03, 2014) at
 24/02/2017 11:25:20 AM,
	Serialize complete at 24/02/2017 11:25:20 AM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 0007CF4D4A2580D1_="
Sender: owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com

 
 I have no problem with changing the judge to Richard, I only volunteered 
to get the process going.

Mike 4309






From:   Ken Kittlitz <kittlitz@gmail.com>
To:     fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Date:   24/02/2017 10:09
Subject:        Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
Sent by:        owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com



I can change the judge in the DB if you're OK with it, Sam.

Regarding the mailing list issues -- the server OS version (elderly 
CentOS) and majordomo are definitely having problems with modern email 
verification. Yahoo.com addresses are particularly a problem, since yahoo 
will now reject incoming mail with a 'From' line containing a yahoo.com 
address but which wasn't actually sent from yahoo.com.  Unfortunately, 
that's the case for majordomo messages. I don't know if there's a way 
around this; last I looked, newer list software like Mailman was also 
affected.

   -Ken

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote:
So it turns out that Richard Woods had written to the mailing list asking 
to be judge for TrumpX, after Mike said he'd do it, but before I actually 
assigned the judge. For whatever reason -- a combination of his @yahoo 
address, fx's mailing filter, and my spam filter, it seems -- his message 
did not get to me in time.

Richard is now very adamant that he be made judge for this claim instead 
of Mike, because I had offered it to him first.

I haven't heard of this ever being an issue, but it seems important to 
Richard. I have no reason to object, although it seems odd to me. Does 
anyone else have opinions on whether Mike should be replaced by Richard? 
Does Mike care? Ken, is it possible?

Sam


On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> 
wrote:
Thank you, Mike, I've added you as the judge.

Sam

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:18 PM, <MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au> wrote:
If your original volunteer doesn't get back to you, I'm happy to fill in.

Mike 4309 



From:        Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> 
To:        fx-propose@ideosphere.com 
Date:        16/02/2017 01:56 
Subject:        Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp' 
Sent by:        owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com 




Clearly things are heating up on this front, and we still have no claim to 
trade... 

Does anyone volunteer to be a judge on this? 

In case it got lost in the ticker name change, the claim can be found at 
http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX 

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote: 

Thank you. 

Richard Woods, I think this meets many of your concerns from earlier. Are 
you still interested in judging? 

Sam 

On Jan 28, 2017 2:27 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <kittlitz@gmail.com> wrote: 
OK, it should be done now. Let me know if anything appears amiss. 

  -Ken 

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote: 

Since no one has made a comment on that one way or another then yes, 
thanks. 

On Jan 27, 2017 5:24 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <kittlitz@gmail.com> wrote: 
I can probably change it in the DB.  You'd like the symbol to be 'TrumpX'? 


   -Ken 

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote: 

Also, how do I change the ticker symbol? Do I have to delete it and make a 
new claim? 

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote: 

Sorry, I dropped the ball on this. 

How about we keep the Resign option, but forget about trying to judge any 
reasoning behind it. So far, the only president who has resigned was about 
to be impeached anyway. 

How about: 

TrumpX 

Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States, will either be 
impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office, 
before January 20, 2021. 

The claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on the adoption of 
a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment; conviction by the 
Senate is not material to the claim. The claim may also be judged early on 
death, but should not be judged early if Trump vacates office for any 
other reason, in case he is reinstated before the judgement date. 

Thoughts? Richard, would you still be willing to judge? 

Sam 

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <scryer@gmail.com> wrote: 
I'm still fine with the TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to propose 
others or offer proposed improvements to this one. 

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail <
chrisran.bma@virgin.net> wrote: 
I seem to have killed this conversation. 
Not sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be 
an actionable libel ? " 
Perhaps we should instead consider two claim: 
Trump wins second term and 
Trump is not president for at least 30 consecutive days of what would be 
expected to be his first term. 
Regards 
Chris 



-- 
          Jim Gillogly 










Back to regular message display

All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL