I can change the judge in the DB if you're OK with it, Sam.
Regarding the mailing list issues -- the server OS version (elderly
CentOS) and majordomo are definitely having problems with modern email
verification. Yahoo.com addresses are particularly a problem, since yahoo
will now reject incoming mail with a 'From' line containing a yahoo.com
address but which wasn't actually sent from yahoo.com. Unfortunately,
that's the case for majordomo messages. I don't know if there's a way
around this; last I looked, newer list software like Mailman was also
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Sam Fentress <email@example.com> wrote:
So it turns out that Richard Woods had written to the mailing list asking
to be judge for TrumpX, after Mike said he'd do it, but before I actually
assigned the judge. For whatever reason -- a combination of his @yahoo
address, fx's mailing filter, and my spam filter, it seems -- his message
did not get to me in time.
Richard is now very adamant that he be made judge for this claim instead
of Mike, because I had offered it to him first.
I haven't heard of this ever being an issue, but it seems important to
Richard. I have no reason to object, although it seems odd to me. Does
anyone else have opinions on whether Mike should be replaced by Richard?
Does Mike care? Ken, is it possible?
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Sam Fentress <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Thank you, Mike, I've added you as the judge.
How about we keep the Resign option, but forget about trying to judge any
reasoning behind it. So far, the only president who has resigned was about
to be impeached anyway.
Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States, will either be
impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office,
before January 20, 2021.
The claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on the adoption of
a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment; conviction by the
Senate is not material to the claim. The claim may also be judged early on
death, but should not be judged early if Trump vacates office for any
other reason, in case he is reinstated before the judgement date.
Thoughts? Richard, would you still be willing to judge?
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <email@example.com> wrote:
I'm still fine with the TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to propose
others or offer proposed improvements to this one.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail < firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I seem to have killed this conversation.
Not sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be
an actionable libel ? "
Perhaps we should instead consider two claim:
Trump wins second term and
Trump is not president for at least 30 consecutive days of what would be
expected to be his first term.