Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-discuss: Claim Sorb judged false - surely it is true

Author: Evan Daniel
Conversation: fx-discuss: Claim Sorb judged false - surely it is true ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-discuss ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: Sam Fentress's post
Date: Tue Mar 09, 2021 12:36 am
Sam Fentress
Evan Daniel
chrisran.bma e-mail



Was there any "transport" at all in either of those categories for the
year? I kinda assume no, and the claim clearly says "exceed".
Presumably "transport" means "as published in industry surveys".

Evan Daniel
4465
(Apparently I briefly held a single share at one point.)

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 8:51 PM Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The claim specifically refers to "transportation." How can a sounding rocket fit this definition better than a military aircraft?
>
> Sam (disclosure: never held any Sorb)
>
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 6:53 PM chrisran.bma e-mail <chrisran.bma@virgin.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> The claim sorb appears to have been judged as false. I believe it is true.
>>
>> The only flying aircraft that can do mach 2.5 are military and I would suggest not transport as in having a paying customer, which was suggested by claim creator.
>>
>> There are lots of sounding rocket used for research and these often are operated for fee paying researchers. I believe they often meet the required speed and don't use locally available gasses.
>>
>> So some suborbital exceeds zero high-mach air transportation.
>>
>> The claim should be discussed and considered rather than just being judged false.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> (crandles 7886)
>>
>> disclosure I had over +4000 holding

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL