Ideosphere Forum
From Sun Feb  7 17:38:18 2021
Received: from (localhost [])
	by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 117McIHG006950
	for <>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:38:18 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id 117McIYX006949
	for fx-discuss-outgoing; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:38:18 -0500
Received: from ( [])
	by (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 117McH3P006943
	for <>; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 17:38:18 -0500
Received: from [] (
	by with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <>)
	id 1l8sh6-0006fX-Ki
	for; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 23:38:16 +0100
Received: from ([])
	by with ESMTP
	id 8sh6lXIpjxC0w8sh6ls7rX; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 23:38:16 +0100
X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=KKyfsHJo c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60206bd8
 a=3Amxf2QPfMiVt6ICWsHjRQ==:117 a=_RzGfswWPCgA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10
 a=ok4XLe8B8QoA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=As9HSkiN61Wq9lNw8E4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;
	s=meg.feb2017; t=1612737496;
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 22:38:16 +0000 (GMT)
From: "chrisran.bma e-mail" <>
Message-ID: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Subject: Re: fx-discuss: Judges required
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.8.4-Rev72
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfKhTmo4D6mewR/SaovDGqMDW10D0U9YDmpF9Omk/mW8FUmg9KJ/dlNSTPe9DKMnpXCi6SSWmfwADqEXU9zIZjmg6vx8pgOmf9Vs/6uvCVGS1yEuA8QKm
Precedence: bulk

 I hold +19 BupCan but would judge it no. (Problem is what if I say I will judge it no but when appointed judge it yes. I know I wouldn't risk doing that but you don't whatever I say.)

I have no current holdings in JaNP but have traded it. If no-one else offers I can delete my book orders and become judge.

I have just sold the one and only NoGuns coupon I have ever owned and deleted my book orders so I can volunteer for this one if no one better volunteers.

I have holding in all the other claims listed some quite sizable so would be grateful if anyone is able to volunteer for any of these.

GDNA and Sorb claims are possibly true and at least potentially controversial so you may want to be wary before agreeing to be judge of those. Not sure of proper procedure here. Should we get judge appointed before discussing case for a true or false judgement or discuss it first then appoint a judge who seems impartial or has taken majority view. Latter might rule out potential judges and make it even harder to find a volunteer. With former, judge, if one is found, might take a minority view.

(crandles 7886)

> On 07 February 2021 at 21:35 John Monroe <> wrote:
> There are a number of other claims that can be judged now as well, including
> BupCan
> ChMoon
> JaNP
> Korea1
> Kuc21
> NoGuns
> OzNuk
> VbKT

Back to regular message display

All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL