Ideosphere Forum: Message

From owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com Fri Feb 24 14:33:28 2017
Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1OJXS3s010429
	for <fx-propose-outgoing@ideosphere.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:33:28 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id v1OJXStB010428
	for fx-propose-outgoing; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:33:28 -0500
Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (mail-qk0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1OJXQf3010425
	for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:33:27 -0500
Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id s186so27293391qkb.1
        for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:33:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=S8qM7m2DCDvmUb/31aeYyG7EBpmbqWWBlVlStZyWEKc=;
        b=btVAF1YD96AVM3eIP+l1jFoCK1eu3Rs18WUyEOAvIPAt4mm67ETopidsusWsuUEPjw
         OrHJKtylfMtT/P1t84aA4aeJxz4qKGPJlZjXz+RtNVlvUgldkm+7W7g+YtTI050TxEKq
         6LxRkFqCLCK7/qbyI/QndLUNmYNlo2C4Kq9WxCT6UJjLywfb2o8cSLQY9C9unOQpxdId
         rGtR908SslAZ/XckVsk0qIMXtOekEaKrqCRTqxYxscL+RVRrViviOz4Z4YrSIsStmSnH
         BNSGFgatVkPqmGEYrNPiULoEqbFrNp/6xqVia3XxGD05LO4AS6Kaforfia77f7q40UnI
         h4Vg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=S8qM7m2DCDvmUb/31aeYyG7EBpmbqWWBlVlStZyWEKc=;
        b=WypjwTdb9d9FZ1Bnzbm5qh3zmaHTtaML9+8SC+TnTecYq8RFJSFL7DytgrUltEQ7S7
         MNx1ftOmZjOt7v6Nx3UmsARFf8ycljPSbcUKzfnuB+Z0P1RYCfiKsV5Ar+JgO/Uf/P8i
         dfF4cEhDkbQCq/hf+jt4CDfxtWfPW8cgFdN72A7pkvg5Fhryj1HAPl0vUmYk8SOQILVP
         x/o+vynwUTUJ3yAPvULg+tXIQDc9kDpjj97gyCXyzQ+3zVp7PS3/7vOuVyeGJvEXp+3r
         Pl20h3+AoLgoeHzZmNbLdDud3t/zuHvhPTUvnIlfFbP1MA/SY8NTIiShdZ5q++JSdgnc
         s4Dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mzpeWb6BHP+SneavzMtkybOI54ORUWRnNN7Uo8F2yYrUrnk5mO0qcXCwrO/8oaDFjYhhrdQK/IN0L90g==
X-Received: by 10.55.19.197 with SMTP id 66mr4175945qkt.73.1487964805772; Fri,
 24 Feb 2017 11:33:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.150.110 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 11:33:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAra84RDT3go2p+VytUNmgNY2UeL0H+YuwDzT0W0orvnPRqN4g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201701121852.v0CIq92S002947@ideosphere.com> <722B4A4D-14AA-4B7F-895A-214ADFC2BFCE@postmodern.com>
 <6389620b-4867-bbe1-c1e9-d40be237db51@pobox.com> <CAAra84R7SCvrHo4aTo89UZK5pA9Z4QvYKbZSbo+Fh9EOsE6+oA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1009793118.1088178.1484322439398.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe17.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <b59239a6-acf9-be47-f692-acad4a7c758b@pobox.com> <1817388409.1097547.1484339345031.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe17.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <1703629019.1351450.1485012664436.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe15.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <CA+EdDHiu+8mPAZTsb_6O59cSyZ6LZn7H=diGvEEg2uD=wp1d7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAra84T1L+KgMqEVHN0Ud-9oiiPENSMB1ab5D1txaU_8pOppQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACJR2qFNwCM9gYsYWyUpzv-eOnPCkyv9z013A=-ZAxfnwJywyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <OFB92F69C0.1EF0F32A-ON4A2580D1.0007809C-4A2580D1.0007CFF6@blackandwhitecabs.com.au>
 <CAAra84RDT3go2p+VytUNmgNY2UeL0H+YuwDzT0W0orvnPRqN4g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ken Kittlitz <kittlitz@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:33:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CACJR2qHw359AU+c0s0bXub_KrcZKsPkpxZgJ2j7cOKG6eF55+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fcf6cafc54205494bcd3a
Sender: owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com

 
 OK, I've changed the judge to be Richard.

   -Ken

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote:

> Great, let's make the switch, then.
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
>
> On Feb 23, 2017 8:27 PM, <MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au> wrote:
>
>> I have no problem with changing the judge to Richard, I only volunteered
>> to get the process going.
>>
>> Mike 4309
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From:        Ken Kittlitz <kittlitz@gmail.com>
>> To:        fx-propose@ideosphere.com
>> Date:        24/02/2017 10:09
>> Subject:        Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
>> Sent by:        owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> I can change the judge in the DB if you're OK with it, Sam.
>>
>> Regarding the mailing list issues -- the server OS version (elderly
>> CentOS) and majordomo are definitely having problems with modern email
>> verification. Yahoo.com addresses are particularly a problem, since yahoo
>> will now reject incoming mail with a 'From' line containing a *yahoo.com*
>> <http://yahoo.com/> address but which wasn't actually sent from
>> *yahoo.com* <http://yahoo.com/>.  Unfortunately, that's the case for
>> majordomo messages. I don't know if there's a way around this; last I
>> looked, newer list software like Mailman was also affected.
>>
>>    -Ken
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> So it turns out that Richard Woods had written to the mailing list asking
>> to be judge for TrumpX, after Mike said he'd do it, but before I actually
>> assigned the judge. For whatever reason -- a combination of his @yahoo
>> address, fx's mailing filter, and my spam filter, it seems -- his message
>> did not get to me in time.
>>
>> Richard is now very adamant that he be made judge for this claim instead
>> of Mike, because I had offered it to him first.
>>
>> I haven't heard of this ever being an issue, but it seems important to
>> Richard. I have no reason to object, although it seems odd to me. Does
>> anyone else have opinions on whether Mike should be replaced by Richard?
>> Does Mike care? Ken, is it possible?
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Thank you, Mike, I've added you as the judge.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:18 PM, <*MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au*
>> <MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au>> wrote:
>> If your original volunteer doesn't get back to you, I'm happy to fill in.
>>
>> Mike 4309
>>
>>
>>
>> From:        Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com* <sfentress@gmail.com>>
>> To:        *fx-propose@ideosphere.com* <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>
>> Date:        16/02/2017 01:56
>> Subject:        Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
>> Sent by:        *owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com*
>> <owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Clearly things are heating up on this front, and we still have no claim
>> to trade...
>>
>> Does anyone volunteer to be a judge on this?
>>
>> In case it got lost in the ticker name change, the claim can be found at
>> *http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX*
>> <http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Richard Woods, I think this meets many of your concerns from earlier. Are
>> you still interested in judging?
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On Jan 28, 2017 2:27 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
>> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> OK, it should be done now. Let me know if anything appears amiss.
>>
>>   -Ken
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Since no one has made a comment on that one way or another then yes,
>> thanks.
>>
>> On Jan 27, 2017 5:24 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
>> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I can probably change it in the DB.  You'd like the symbol to be
>> 'TrumpX'?
>>
>>    -Ken
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Also, how do I change the ticker symbol? Do I have to delete it and make
>> a new claim?
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Sorry, I dropped the ball on this.
>>
>> How about we keep the Resign option, but forget about trying to judge any
>> reasoning behind it. So far, the only president who has resigned was about
>> to be impeached anyway.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> * TrumpX*
>>
>> Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States, will either be
>> impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office,
>> before January 20, 2021.
>>
>> The claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on the adoption of
>> a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment; conviction by the
>> Senate is not material to the claim. The claim may also be judged early on
>> death, but should not be judged early if Trump vacates office for any other
>> reason, in case he is reinstated before the judgement date.
>>
>> Thoughts? Richard, would you still be willing to judge?
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <*scryer@gmail.com*
>> <scryer@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> I'm still fine with the TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to
>> propose others or offer proposed improvements to this one.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail <
>> *chrisran.bma@virgin.net* <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>> wrote:
>> I seem to have killed this conversation.
>>
>> Not sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be
>> an actionable libel ? "
>>
>> Perhaps we should instead consider two claim:
>>
>> Trump wins second term and
>>
>> Trump is not president for at least 30 consecutive days of what would be
>> expected to be his first term.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>           Jim Gillogly
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Back to regular message display