Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'

Conversation: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp' ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-propose ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: Sam Fentress's post
Date: Wed Feb 15, 2017 07:18 pm
Sam Fentress
Sam Fentress

If your original volunteer doesn't get back to you, I'm happy to fill in.

Mike 4309

From: Sam Fentress <>
Date: 16/02/2017 01:56
Subject: Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
Sent by:

Clearly things are heating up on this front, and we still have no claim to

Does anyone volunteer to be a judge on this?

In case it got lost in the ticker name change, the claim can be found at

On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Sam Fentress <> wrote:
Thank you.

Richard Woods, I think this meets many of your concerns from earlier. Are
you still interested in judging?


On Jan 28, 2017 2:27 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <> wrote:
OK, it should be done now. Let me know if anything appears amiss.


On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sam Fentress <> wrote:
Since no one has made a comment on that one way or another then yes,

On Jan 27, 2017 5:24 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <> wrote:
I can probably change it in the DB. You'd like the symbol to be 'TrumpX'?


On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Sam Fentress <> wrote:
Also, how do I change the ticker symbol? Do I have to delete it and make a
new claim?

On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Sam Fentress <> wrote:
Sorry, I dropped the ball on this.

How about we keep the Resign option, but forget about trying to judge any
reasoning behind it. So far, the only president who has resigned was about
to be impeached anyway.

How about:


Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States, will either be
impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office,
before January 20, 2021.

The claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on the adoption of
a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment; conviction by the
Senate is not material to the claim. The claim may also be judged early on
death, but should not be judged early if Trump vacates office for any
other reason, in case he is reinstated before the judgement date.

Thoughts? Richard, would you still be willing to judge?


On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <> wrote:
I'm still fine with the TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to propose
others or offer proposed improvements to this one.

On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail <> wrote:
I seem to have killed this conversation.
Not sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be
an actionable libel ? "
Perhaps we should instead consider two claim:
Trump wins second term and
Trump is not president for at least 30 consecutive days of what would be
expected to be his first term.

Jim Gillogly


All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL