Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-discuss: Claim Sorb judged false - surely it is true

Author: Sam Fentress
Conversation: fx-discuss: Claim Sorb judged false - surely it is true ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-discuss ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: chrisran.bma e-mail's post
Followed-Up-By: Evan Daniel's post
Date: Sun Mar 07, 2021 10:50 pm
chrisran.bma e-mail
Sam FentressMichael C. Berch
Evan DanielJames Bowery



The claim specifically refers to "transportation." How can a sounding
rocket fit this definition better than a military aircraft?

Sam (disclosure: never held any Sorb)

On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 6:53 PM chrisran.bma e-mail <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>
wrote:

> Hi
>
> The claim sorb appears to have been judged as false. I believe it is true.
>
> The only flying aircraft that can do mach 2.5 are military and I would
> suggest not transport as in having a paying customer, which was suggested
> by claim creator.
>
> There are lots of sounding rocket used for research and these often are
> operated for fee paying researchers. I believe they often meet the required
> speed and don't use locally available gasses.
>
> So some suborbital exceeds zero high-mach air transportation.
>
> The claim should be discussed and considered rather than just being judged
> false.
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
>
> (crandles 7886)
>
> disclosure I had over +4000 holding
>
>

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL