Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-discuss: FX Claim GDNA - Germ-line DNA altered B4 2020

Author: Neal Gafter
Conversation: Re: fx-discuss: FX Claim GDNA - Germ-line DNA altered B4 2020 ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-discuss ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: chrisran.bma e-mail's post
Followed-Up-By: chrisran.bma e-mail's post
Date: Mon Nov 26, 2018 09:44 pm
chrisran.bma e-mail
Neal Gafter




There is currently a lack of evidence that the changes extend to the germ
line of the individuals, so I (as judge) am not even going to evaluate the
other factors.

On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 7:58 AM chrisran.bma e-mail <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>
wrote:

> https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-46342195
>
> Twins born possibly with editted genome. There seem doubts about whether
> this really did edit genome.
>
> "Prof He Jiankui says the twin girls, born a few weeks ago, had their DNA
> altered as embryos to prevent them from contracting HIV."
>
> Also there seems doubts about whether it should have been allowed. Does
> the judge have any comments on such a situation where it has happened but
> country has not specifically permitted it / has banned it / is scientific
> misconduct, but despite lack of permission / ban / misconduct, it has
> happened? I.e. is the claim about it being permitted or about it actually
> happening?
>
> If it is about it happening not about it being permitted, then this case
> may need to be followed in order to give correct judgement and seems worth
> bringing to the judge's attention.
>
> Best Regards
>
> Chris
>
> (crandles 7886)
>
> Disclosure: I hold 302 yes
>

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL