Ideosphere Forum
From owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com Thu Feb 23 19:08:58 2017
Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1O08w07018942
	for <fx-propose-outgoing@ideosphere.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:08:58 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id v1O08wdU018941
	for fx-propose-outgoing; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:08:58 -0500
Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com (mail-qt0-f173.google.com [209.85.216.173])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id v1O08vBi018938
	for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:08:57 -0500
Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n21so5955560qta.1
        for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:08:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=N029aMkTYDT90kLtBLkXebm4XpsiTKC8Ck2xJnh2vOc=;
        b=YdwzweGaC3/UbQrb2EKIS71/SVabzJzKekaV5RP6sKvo9YPcKtGLOWMEGd0Pxmk6GD
         BaF8m48wNgNDLubt50XW7iAMvqllTMxEONQrEkZN9GFAiB2pgTyMPS2WMCpjsKcdvxe8
         ixqDJLEnmO3VJ5lZj2Nqr4+jq0e/xGmKGJEBrQTHPPtCd2iKdbGmKWM9kO0DHdayTxfh
         IRhm9mvQcNFXIFLltH3LUX9wyg2wVUY7+rN59Dvf7qZTdy+PyBIGBlnBEc5gpT0in3D7
         0ZHfY9eyTGxqSqSYtGQJekNFofE2unQzHY5Zl3O8Y/Ir87A7HUfmbxzaLYyqQmnLH7s0
         avJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=N029aMkTYDT90kLtBLkXebm4XpsiTKC8Ck2xJnh2vOc=;
        b=JIb7GgT5VOio9zZBHNii54RQSuhDjaEqbQYpV7HGaIu9/UD/POQtQkukHzrOMgMo2x
         F8RMLL9uuSSj9k5gTHo1psLE/h346Z4rUDDeWjrgXw2vKCxf015oq8uu9zuDIvysd4/C
         G7pIu3Cyky1fzBcP8wIL/IRrLViTRm6jLHOD/SwdTnvqPJw/kW3hWIf8o+MK8l9g91XW
         eIv85I6nYu5dMP/Y0042cwznpMQlApPQjm2pyyRO2Mr3C3iEaesRt23rrIQMbXGSKSGE
         RgOxa5sVudK923aOj32qTKaoKriHYOfK/1NQ2jv0XTLM4TuJ7U7CXb4A7ybLcd8JIt13
         23gw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nIQ5328UuIf1bp6aF/k3kBaP1wHOA+ft5UAlSQL0s00o+z2Br2F7UBS4QLbP8sE2njIWolKByPeR0m1g==
X-Received: by 10.237.37.165 with SMTP id x34mr27555520qtc.0.1487894936383;
 Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:08:56 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.150.110 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:08:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAra84SXm4Bwo7ifDvmcPayJsQQauuSD1uXtf4+23TU0Uu3Zgg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201701121852.v0CIq92S002947@ideosphere.com> <CA+EdDHiik2b=G7nj+kdOZnRTo6=H4why=aypbOq_SQShw+p3Ag@mail.gmail.com>
 <722B4A4D-14AA-4B7F-895A-214ADFC2BFCE@postmodern.com> <6389620b-4867-bbe1-c1e9-d40be237db51@pobox.com>
 <CAAra84R7SCvrHo4aTo89UZK5pA9Z4QvYKbZSbo+Fh9EOsE6+oA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1009793118.1088178.1484322439398.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe17.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <b59239a6-acf9-be47-f692-acad4a7c758b@pobox.com> <1817388409.1097547.1484339345031.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe17.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <1703629019.1351450.1485012664436.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe15.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <CA+EdDHiu+8mPAZTsb_6O59cSyZ6LZn7H=diGvEEg2uD=wp1d7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAra84T1L+KgMqEVHN0Ud-9oiiPENSMB1ab5D1txaU_8pOppQg@mail.gmail.com>
 <OF16B738F7.3E6331DD-ON4A2580C9.0000B7FB-4A2580C9.0001B2A4@blackandwhitecabs.com.au>
 <CAAra84TgFidXcuHodKRF2HGB6M18VOrboqTg2fJMwUZ0Oa3LuQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAra84SXm4Bwo7ifDvmcPayJsQQauuSD1uXtf4+23TU0Uu3Zgg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ken Kittlitz <kittlitz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 17:08:55 -0700
Message-ID: <CACJR2qFNwCM9gYsYWyUpzv-eOnPCkyv9z013A=-ZAxfnwJywyw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d7ef6257ee605493b89dd
Sender: owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com

 
 I can change the judge in the DB if you're OK with it, Sam.

Regarding the mailing list issues -- the server OS version (elderly CentOS)
and majordomo are definitely having problems with modern email
verification. Yahoo.com addresses are particularly a problem, since yahoo
will now reject incoming mail with a 'From' line containing a yahoo.com
address but which wasn't actually sent from yahoo.com.  Unfortunately,
that's the case for majordomo messages. I don't know if there's a way
around this; last I looked, newer list software like Mailman was also
affected.

   -Ken

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote:

> So it turns out that Richard Woods had written to the mailing list asking
> to be judge for TrumpX, after Mike said he'd do it, but before I actually
> assigned the judge. For whatever reason -- a combination of his @yahoo
> address, fx's mailing filter, and my spam filter, it seems -- his message
> did not get to me in time.
>
> Richard is now very adamant that he be made judge for this claim instead
> of Mike, because I had offered it to him first.
>
> I haven't heard of this ever being an issue, but it seems important to
> Richard. I have no reason to object, although it seems odd to me. Does
> anyone else have opinions on whether Mike should be replaced by Richard?
> Does Mike care? Ken, is it possible?
>
> Sam
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Mike, I've added you as the judge.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:18 PM, <MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If your original volunteer doesn't get back to you, I'm happy to fill in.
>>>
>>> Mike 4309
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From:        Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
>>> To:        fx-propose@ideosphere.com
>>> Date:        16/02/2017 01:56
>>> Subject:        Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
>>> Sent by:        owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Clearly things are heating up on this front, and we still have no claim
>>> to trade...
>>>
>>> Does anyone volunteer to be a judge on this?
>>>
>>> In case it got lost in the ticker name change, the claim can be found at
>>> *http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX*
>>> <http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Richard Woods, I think this meets many of your concerns from earlier.
>>> Are you still interested in judging?
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2017 2:27 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
>>> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> OK, it should be done now. Let me know if anything appears amiss.
>>>
>>>   -Ken
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Since no one has made a comment on that one way or another then yes,
>>> thanks.
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2017 5:24 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
>>> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I can probably change it in the DB.  You'd like the symbol to be
>>> 'TrumpX'?
>>>
>>>    -Ken
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Also, how do I change the ticker symbol? Do I have to delete it and make
>>> a new claim?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Sorry, I dropped the ball on this.
>>>
>>> How about we keep the Resign option, but forget about trying to judge
>>> any reasoning behind it. So far, the only president who has resigned was
>>> about to be impeached anyway.
>>>
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> *TrumpX*
>>>
>>> Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States, will either be
>>> impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office,
>>> before January 20, 2021.
>>>
>>> The claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on the adoption
>>> of a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment; conviction by
>>> the Senate is not material to the claim. The claim may also be judged early
>>> on death, but should not be judged early if Trump vacates office for any
>>> other reason, in case he is reinstated before the judgement date.
>>>
>>> Thoughts? Richard, would you still be willing to judge?
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <*scryer@gmail.com*
>>> <scryer@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I'm still fine with the TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to
>>> propose others or offer proposed improvements to this one.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail <
>>> *chrisran.bma@virgin.net* <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>> wrote:
>>> I seem to have killed this conversation.
>>>
>>> Not sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be
>>> an actionable libel ? "
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should instead consider two claim:
>>>
>>> Trump wins second term and
>>>
>>> Trump is not president for at least 30 consecutive days of what would be
>>> expected to be his first term.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>           Jim Gillogly
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Back to regular message display

All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL