Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'

Author: Ken Kittlitz
Conversation: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp' ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-propose ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: Sam Fentress's post
Followed-Up-By: MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au's post
Date: Thu Feb 23, 2017 07:08 pm
Sam Fentress
Ken Kittlitz
MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au



I can change the judge in the DB if you're OK with it, Sam.

Regarding the mailing list issues -- the server OS version (elderly CentOS)
and majordomo are definitely having problems with modern email
verification. Yahoo.com addresses are particularly a problem, since yahoo
will now reject incoming mail with a 'From' line containing a yahoo.com
address but which wasn't actually sent from yahoo.com. Unfortunately,
that's the case for majordomo messages. I don't know if there's a way
around this; last I looked, newer list software like Mailman was also
affected.

-Ken

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:47 AM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com> wrote:

> So it turns out that Richard Woods had written to the mailing list asking
> to be judge for TrumpX, after Mike said he'd do it, but before I actually
> assigned the judge. For whatever reason -- a combination of his @yahoo
> address, fx's mailing filter, and my spam filter, it seems -- his message
> did not get to me in time.
>
> Richard is now very adamant that he be made judge for this claim instead
> of Mike, because I had offered it to him first.
>
> I haven't heard of this ever being an issue, but it seems important to
> Richard. I have no reason to object, although it seems odd to me. Does
> anyone else have opinions on whether Mike should be replaced by Richard?
> Does Mike care? Ken, is it possible?
>
> Sam
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Mike, I've added you as the judge.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:18 PM, <MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If your original volunteer doesn't get back to you, I'm happy to fill in.
>>>
>>> Mike 4309
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
>>> To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com
>>> Date: 16/02/2017 01:56
>>> Subject: Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
>>> Sent by: owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Clearly things are heating up on this front, and we still have no claim
>>> to trade...
>>>
>>> Does anyone volunteer to be a judge on this?
>>>
>>> In case it got lost in the ticker name change, the claim can be found at
>>> *http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX*
>>> <http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> Richard Woods, I think this meets many of your concerns from earlier.
>>> Are you still interested in judging?
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> On Jan 28, 2017 2:27 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
>>> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> OK, it should be done now. Let me know if anything appears amiss.
>>>
>>> -Ken
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Since no one has made a comment on that one way or another then yes,
>>> thanks.
>>>
>>> On Jan 27, 2017 5:24 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
>>> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I can probably change it in the DB. You'd like the symbol to be
>>> 'TrumpX'?
>>>
>>> -Ken
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Also, how do I change the ticker symbol? Do I have to delete it and make
>>> a new claim?
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
>>> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Sorry, I dropped the ball on this.
>>>
>>> How about we keep the Resign option, but forget about trying to judge
>>> any reasoning behind it. So far, the only president who has resigned was
>>> about to be impeached anyway.
>>>
>>> How about:
>>>
>>> *TrumpX*
>>>
>>> Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States, will either be
>>> impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office,
>>> before January 20, 2021.
>>>
>>> The claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on the adoption
>>> of a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment; conviction by
>>> the Senate is not material to the claim. The claim may also be judged early
>>> on death, but should not be judged early if Trump vacates office for any
>>> other reason, in case he is reinstated before the judgement date.
>>>
>>> Thoughts? Richard, would you still be willing to judge?
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <*scryer@gmail.com*
>>> <scryer@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> I'm still fine with the TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to
>>> propose others or offer proposed improvements to this one.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail <
>>> *chrisran.bma@virgin.net* <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>> wrote:
>>> I seem to have killed this conversation.
>>>
>>> Not sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be
>>> an actionable libel ? "
>>>
>>> Perhaps we should instead consider two claim:
>>>
>>> Trump wins second term and
>>>
>>> Trump is not president for at least 30 consecutive days of what would be
>>> expected to be his first term.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jim Gillogly
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL