Ideosphere Forum | |||
From owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com Sun Apr 26 17:45:17 2015 Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3QLjGcI004968 for <fx-propose-outgoing@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:45:17 -0400 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t3QLjGFU004967 for fx-propose-outgoing; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:45:16 -0400 Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3QLjG3p004964 for <fx-propose@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:45:16 -0400 Received: (from ideo@localhost) by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t3QLjGTi004962; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:45:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:45:16 -0400 Message-Id: <201504262145.t3QLjGTi004962@ideosphere.com> From: FX <info@ideosphere.com> To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com Subject: fx-propose: Proposal: 'SSCBSA' X-Mailer: FX Sender: owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com Precedence: bulk Reply-To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com The following claim has been proposed. If you have constructive suggestions for improving it, please follow-up to this message. Thank you. claim: SSCBSA owner: 7395 (fej) judge: TBD short: Alain Philippon Loses Case long: In North America, since at least the days of the Bush/Martin governments in US/Canada, attempts have been made to harmonize border policies in the United States and Canadian border regions. One such example is that both governments attempt to maintain the ultimate right to search the computers, cellphones and other non-paper data storage devices of travelers as they travel from country to country. However their right to do so, at least on the Canadian side, was not legally tested until 2015 when Alain Philippon, 38, of Ste-Anne-des-Plaines, Quebec refused to allow the CBSA agents access to his data. Philippon has since been charged under section 153.1 (b) of the Customs Act for hindering or preventing border officers from performing their role under the act and his case is going through the courts. If Philippon wins his case in the Quebec court system without going to the supreme court, this claim will be judged 1. If Philippon loses his case and his case is subsequently refused by the supreme court of canada, it will be judged 0. If Philippon loses his case, but the Supreme court hears the case, this claim will be judged on a scale based on how many supreme court justices vote in favour of Philippon, divided evenly among them and against the border security agents having this power. There are 9 supreme court justices, so for example if the outcome is 4-3 in his favour (ie he wins by 1 vote, with 2 abstentions), it will pay out 4/9*100% = 45 (rounded up in case of a fractional amount). due date: (signed) FX Back to regular message display | |||
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL |