Ideosphere Forum
From owner-fx-discuss@maxwell.lucifer.com  Fri Jul 19 17:44:50 1996
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by maxwell.lucifer.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) id RAA25021 for fx-discuss-outgoing; Fri, 19 Jul 1996 17:44:50 -0600
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 16:43:20 MST
From: "Richard Schroeppel" <rcs@cs.arizona.edu>
Message-Id: <199607192343.AA23436@leibniz.cs.arizona.edu>
To: if-discuss@lucifer.com
Subject: if-discuss: too many Claims?
Reply-To: if-discuss@lucifer.com
Sender: owner-fx-discuss@lucifer.com
Precedence: bulk

 
 Dave Steele suggests that having #Claims ~= #traders is a bad thing.

I think the only real requirement is that the number of traders
interested in each issue be at least 2.

To my mind, the interesting question is how many holders (or traders)
of each claim are there?

We might implement Robin's original auto-market-maker idea, for use on
the thinly traded claims.

Rich Schroeppel   rcs@cs.arizona.edu


Back to regular message display

All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL