Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'

Author: chrisran.bma e-mail
Conversation: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp' ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-propose ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To: Anton Sherwood's post
Date: Fri Jan 13, 2017 03:29 pm
Anton Sherwood
chrisran.bma e-mail
chrisran.bma e-mail



>What if by then there are no well respected newspapers? :P

Tee hee, at least you are not claiming that is already the case :P

Could list say 5 media organisations to be consulted instead to clarify what
judge should look at.

.

Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be an actionable libel ?

.

>we'd still be reliant on them to report the motive for the action in question

I think motive for the resignation is irrelevant: it was worded to be whether
impeachment would have been likely to follow if the resignation did not occur.
There would be such extensive coverage of a resignation, I honestly don't
imagine this would be difficult to judge and certainly not from lack of
coverage.

.

In addition to traders potentially feel cheated by a resignation, there is also
the issue of the value of the claim being useful:

If the simple version of the claim trades at 20, is this a 20% chance of an
impeachable scandal or 30% chance with a 1/3 chance of resignation or 60% chance
of impeachable scandal and a 2/3 chance of resignation or .... Claim value =
percentage chance of an impeachable scandal seems more like what we should want
to me.

I think this issue is much more important than whether claim tends to create
trading opportunities.

If this has been considered and rejected as too difficult to judge, then fair
enough, I would still want to see claim approved.

Chris (7886)

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL