Ideosphere Forum

Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'

Author: Sam Fentress
Conversation: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp' ( prev | next ) reply!
Topic: fx-propose ( prev | next )
In-Reply-To:
Followed-Up-By: Sam Fentress's post
Date: Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:03 pm
MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au
Sam Fentress
Sam Fentress



Thank you, Mike, I've added you as the judge.

Sam

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 7:18 PM, <MCowley@blackandwhitecabs.com.au> wrote:

> If your original volunteer doesn't get back to you, I'm happy to fill in.
>
> Mike 4309
>
>
>
> From: Sam Fentress <sfentress@gmail.com>
> To: fx-propose@ideosphere.com
> Date: 16/02/2017 01:56
> Subject: Re: fx-propose: Proposal: 'TruImp'
> Sent by: owner-fx-propose@ideosphere.com
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Clearly things are heating up on this front, and we still have no claim to
> trade...
>
> Does anyone volunteer to be a judge on this?
>
> In case it got lost in the ticker name change, the claim can be found at
> *http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX*
> <http://www.ideosphere.com/fx-bin/Claim?claim=TrumpX
>
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> Richard Woods, I think this meets many of your concerns from earlier. Are
> you still interested in judging?
>
> Sam
>
> On Jan 28, 2017 2:27 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
> OK, it should be done now. Let me know if anything appears amiss.
>
> -Ken
>
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Since no one has made a comment on that one way or another then yes,
> thanks.
>
> On Jan 27, 2017 5:24 PM, "Ken Kittlitz" <*kittlitz@gmail.com*
> <kittlitz@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I can probably change it in the DB. You'd like the symbol to be 'TrumpX'?
>
> -Ken
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 6:34 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Also, how do I change the ticker symbol? Do I have to delete it and make a
> new claim?
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Sam Fentress <*sfentress@gmail.com*
> <sfentress@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Sorry, I dropped the ball on this.
>
> How about we keep the Resign option, but forget about trying to judge any
> reasoning behind it. So far, the only president who has resigned was about
> to be impeached anyway.
>
> How about:
>
> *TrumpX*
>
> Donald Trump, 45th President of the United States, will either be
> impeached by the House of Representatives or will resign from office,
> before January 20, 2021.
>
> The claim may be judged early on formal resignation or on the adoption of
> a House Resolution constituting articles of impeachment; conviction by the
> Senate is not material to the claim. The claim may also be judged early on
> death, but should not be judged early if Trump vacates office for any other
> reason, in case he is reinstated before the judgement date.
>
> Thoughts? Richard, would you still be willing to judge?
>
> Sam
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Jim Gillogly <*scryer@gmail.com*
> <scryer@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I'm still fine with the TruImp proposal as it stands. Feel free to propose
> others or offer proposed improvements to this one.
>
> On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:31 AM, chrisran.bma e-mail <
> *chrisran.bma@virgin.net* <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>> wrote:
> I seem to have killed this conversation.
>
> Not sure if it was my "Should we consider if buying yes coupons could be
> an actionable libel ? "
>
> Perhaps we should instead consider two claim:
>
> Trump wins second term and
>
> Trump is not president for at least 30 consecutive days of what would be
> expected to be his first term.
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> --
> Jim Gillogly
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

source



All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL