Ideosphere Forum
From owner-fx-discuss@ideosphere.com Wed Feb 10 11:21:30 2021
Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 11AGLUmL003086
	for <fx-discuss-outgoing@ideosphere.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:21:30 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id 11AGLUho003085
	for fx-discuss-outgoing; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:21:30 -0500
Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com (mail-wr1-f54.google.com [209.85.221.54])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id 11AGLTAX003060
	for <fx-discuss@ideosphere.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:21:29 -0500
Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id r21so3224486wrr.9
        for <fx-discuss@ideosphere.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:21:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gafter-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=MMVfXDitott71z33N9Zfsxd2wGEgzM2DOh0Rtc67cQw=;
        b=qDTO++wq9o4um5DhBFWYpjxzMnsJTK/3KcIztjf1sMEyyNJrzROT2OOLIhPKKiNkIp
         jV0Yf4CXaYQ4MKnv6kdCyzXzFU568Z4nFDHF9isAvkBiCVWT+udXH9my3m5zSPubVnDC
         rucxwTlMpmWb2nPczVEdCtDBANkhZVy+Ss4Wg+bzMqCJp0hrETyT7Sm6iHkwNfG6pRCD
         NypKTenhD/Wo3do256h8oYmvUJRrowFoMmKm4cCFyGIGI48hwKiDpwcmGOXnu3QNNWR3
         Iqa74I0GUPY8Q0XIm6wMcv56Vg7S3ILck7K7i5l/5OIKrDGhQwgQBktwqMpf24UU8c82
         o6ow==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=MMVfXDitott71z33N9Zfsxd2wGEgzM2DOh0Rtc67cQw=;
        b=MnriEXMHsbcE5OZpEuNUgeOM0Eq1BlLxEaolZmFDYJB7xBy8pPmTGHtYcKTbVZa70y
         pvH7hCDGmklBnxf3w8RYUzQEhE1c4SSHtJ4D9gVY9hXOj+ARhh8+RDvqH56iOXSHxNfy
         ULBu5zIDY00Aoicts8xDitwJyeSCgb/bVOjHDuGqvCTGMBt32GMR2obW6lMFOb8oSOk2
         LrTDJP1ltzIYqtq5PRCR0wFU2qqbu1BzP+uB5k4D1xoksvMDT6rY4Pa2cCe35lMnli2W
         YskmkXV83ugOZMFfFPEK4nWqq8oEfNStDJ61B+Ndy3kT9AilZhy9fIMWgbPWxJBrHUqn
         CYtw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IKw4/po+cxSMvNHYuRn3OXZN52wyxaWwysrGrm1PAwYl8PENH
	kbP0n1wFL1C//57Va5mG0Ql50WjFS2d0RAKi3MDgTpA/XEw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw5h3GCH9O4UO1sckQ4KTTAAhIwoN9H73RUXA1eJI6OiyOdh/IUtrEoRGOewIrF6St9ugeCXi2m1kSHOQ2PWyk=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4391:: with SMTP id i17mr4522630wrq.57.1612974088286;
 Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:21:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <63EBC0A8-400B-4C20-8575-85AE2B647799@davidsj.com>
 <19B23CD2-1FF3-4815-9204-72AA1B5DD2D7@gmail.com> <1226947339.3667534.1612737496545@mail2.virginmedia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1226947339.3667534.1612737496545@mail2.virginmedia.com>
From: Neal Gafter <neal@gafter.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:20:52 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD=nd8d2Ykv9zH=dyNPfKe4yXvivHcdxTzPtQSfpH9cEM8eW4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fx-discuss: Judges required
To: fx-discuss <fx-discuss@ideosphere.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000090749705bafdcb3a"
Sender: owner-fx-discuss@ideosphere.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: fx-discuss@ideosphere.com

 
 I'm responsible for GDNA. Sorry for dragging this out. I will get to work
on it in the next couple of weeks and report back.

On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 2:38 PM chrisran.bma e-mail <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>
wrote:

> I hold +19 BupCan but would judge it no. (Problem is what if I say I will
> judge it no but when appointed judge it yes. I know I wouldn't risk doing
> that but you don't whatever I say.)
>
> I have no current holdings in JaNP but have traded it. If no-one else
> offers I can delete my book orders and become judge.
>
> I have just sold the one and only NoGuns coupon I have ever owned and
> deleted my book orders so I can volunteer for this one if no one better
> volunteers.
>
> I have holding in all the other claims listed some quite sizable so would
> be grateful if anyone is able to volunteer for any of these.
>
> GDNA and Sorb claims are possibly true and at least potentially
> controversial so you may want to be wary before agreeing to be judge of
> those. Not sure of proper procedure here. Should we get judge appointed
> before discussing case for a true or false judgement or discuss it first
> then appoint a judge who seems impartial or has taken majority view. Latter
> might rule out potential judges and make it even harder to find a
> volunteer. With former, judge, if one is found, might take a minority view.
>
> Regards
> Chris
> (crandles 7886)
>
>
> > On 07 February 2021 at 21:35 John Monroe <john.e.monroe@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > There are a number of other claims that can be judged now as well,
> including
> > BupCan
> > ChMoon
> > GDNA
> > ITJOBS
> > JaNP
> > Korea1
> > Kuc21
> > NoGuns
> > OzNuk
> > VbKT
> >
>

Back to regular message display

All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL