Ideosphere Forum
From owner-fx-discuss@ideosphere.com Sun Mar  3 11:17:24 2019
Received: from ideosphere.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x23GHObi025050
	for <fx-discuss-outgoing@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:17:24 -0500
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id x23GHOG1025049
	for fx-discuss-outgoing; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:17:24 -0500
Received: from mail-ua1-f48.google.com (mail-ua1-f48.google.com [209.85.222.48])
	by ideosphere.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id x23GHO8v025046
	for <fx-discuss@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:17:24 -0500
Received: by mail-ua1-f48.google.com with SMTP id x1so2279353uaj.4
        for <fx-discuss@ideosphere.com>; Sun, 03 Mar 2019 08:17:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to;
        bh=r/NSYG52pdxmijHkYwEHQY968QcT68tH1J/7r6jeCq4=;
        b=E6azGWBvjXnwHYPsATRcWeLHdADIq1A/3EMiSZvxR5ERD8V4VKEkybaXLKQYNPmJaq
         moMo4ho6w/QXnRopPqpbexwNbHDkmmv1RxREgsj1g3fB3ZJ4K76kmFW4OSNnJ/9QV3eO
         9TWHIzJ1OzGXbsqd9gx3LXEQdmDHeIKvW+43w4Z+cvKFbSF7moUjO5oTXBmxID1gLxpK
         FLRJ72Et6yJIbpeXmZAx83asrjmafSsAVFXK/t45XL2P0zDdDxl6r0KypW9icP7OIblz
         M8sDS8TrIyYTPD4+SK4sKtxsNvdAgXcLV+DlER/XMfMmKqPS1ewyw2RKjGSpdNqLcuWv
         Potg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWREbCkLQkGmfW8x31gdG+BZkYm4X9cWxMRUbEUa9jFQtFTItEa
	WBPym4aXCdJtUFwlsq2a6W3n/JIHPri5A9e6zcV3nw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx4nzzXElXn1XddTJmhDsVX0n24p4jc7MdSQAxX8Laem2+xnTdZLVUbUZ8xEhB2JYIi0EjigtP4JKKV02t7LZQ=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:e03:: with SMTP id g3mr7463803uak.68.1551629842945;
 Sun, 03 Mar 2019 08:17:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <555197137.1260514.1484754691514.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe15.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <5ff0ce7a-65f1-fff3-ad64-d5fcdfd48a7f@blazde.co.uk> <98fc95b8-23ca-1c35-77a0-2c67e05d6bd1@blazde.co.uk>
 <CABt=Phb135DhUG3AXuaZ0g-D=Ju5OZhWs5ztVyRfKObAF5VYDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABt=PhazeuD=V5vFSgDjHYoevCjHUb40t8=7LwJsLPpuOdQ+MA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAra84T29VgTEPW_VccE6NyiLVV-pcq1KWYNP-eUA=XHMtsc1g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD=nd8dKQA3xtGD_8Kg8JujgDPmEVBkXXDd-Sbgn7CBP2B_X8g@mail.gmail.com>
 <416993406.1320366.1484912813637.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe15.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <d91864b0-dbf9-ac3c-8ef4-bb9d0b879eef@blazde.co.uk> <CAD=nd8dvd2UfmeKkcMKmpXkWu=_uf14MnwV8khapOBvuDxAVFg@mail.gmail.com>
 <37b4104e-24d4-9e0b-a1a8-6a607c5daef9@blazde.co.uk> <CAD=nd8e4FK-QvKW+9Uu-TN7S0ynByMY_TKPJ5wvHOapTFUP3ew@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAra84TAwHCn71xX+itQY1DX+w6=YVjSt-SDYhCyLG4pUOWC9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD=nd8fbgJa5Hk_fWjNot=eFuPNp+Qvz3uwaPg4g1n+NFFSgRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <fda9abc1-04d6-942e-f064-dc55103f8c6d@blazde.co.uk> <CAD=nd8eQ6o0skM2XfVXNAyNnYR-K+9BxWD2TD=_ziSo6oAdg7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD=nd8ewUByWczEt2A+dYyox+JNJJi18hsfZ4+_8mRiNs2wkww@mail.gmail.com>
 <901136494.1350219.1485009272539.JavaMail.open-xchange@oxbe15.tb.ukmail.iss.as9143.net>
 <1690873305.1573107.1532522106660@mail2.virginmedia.com> <1526518883.86807.1543247908025@mail2.virginmedia.com>
 <CAD=nd8dpobvBDPeJ8W9nG_M-FbDmLw9AMC42e_=7xHzQFbtcrw@mail.gmail.com>
 <838939616.78030.1547989052012@mail2.virginmedia.com> <1916464669.311016.1551621567401@mail2.virginmedia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1916464669.311016.1551621567401@mail2.virginmedia.com>
From: Neal Gafter <fx1@neal.gafter.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2019 08:17:11 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD=nd8faQ0N0xa1dS5-83w4R0fzhnTKv_cy5eHtWfk31vA8+dw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: fx-discuss: FX Claim GDNA - Germ-line DNA altered B4 2020
To: fx-discuss@ideosphere.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009c9c89058332f9bf"
Sender: owner-fx-discuss@ideosphere.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: fx-discuss@ideosphere.com

 
 Is there any evidence that the edited genome extends to the germ line?

On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 5:59 AM chrisran.bma e-mail <chrisran.bma@virgin.net>
wrote:

> It appears the preliminary investigation report is out:
>
>
>
> https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/2182964/china-confirms-gene-edited-babies-blames-scientist-he-jiankui
> China confirms birth of gene-edited babies, blames scientist He Jiankui
> for breaking rules
>
> "A team of investigators told the official Xinhua news agency on Monday
> that a preliminary investigation had concluded that He had “organised a
> project team that included foreign staff, which intentionally avoided
> surveillance and used technology of uncertain safety and effectiveness to
> perform human embryo gene-editing activity with the purpose of
> reproduction, which is officially banned in the country”.
> Between March 2017 and November 2018, He forged ethical review papers and
> recruited eight couples to participate in his experiment, resulting in two
> pregnancies.
>
> One of the mothers gave birth to twins nicknamed “Lulu” and “Nana”, the
> investigators said. Another woman is still carrying a gene-edited fetus.
> <https://www.scmp.com/privacy-policy>They also said that He, his staff
> and organisations related to his project would be punished according to
> laws and regulations.
>
>
> The Guangdong government will keep the twins under medical observation."
>
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
>
> crandles (7886) still holding +302
>
>

Back to regular message display

All trademarks, copyrights, and messages on this page are owned by their respective owners.
Forum: Copyright (c) 2000-2001 Javien Inc All rights reserved. Distributed under the GPL